|
•mass cycle (combining all movements-kyrie, Gloria etc- together as one unified composition) • Unified through musical quotations from a pre-existing composition; can be sacred or secular • Uses tenor voice as foundation of mass |
|
|
• series of double mensuration canons, notated in two voices but sung in four parts using the four basic meters (from the Ars Nova) • 2 melodies for 4 voice pieces • prolation canon; used at beginning of prolation mass to get the voices behind each other to eventually create harmony with each other (see pg. 197, Ockeghem’s Missa prolationum) o Basically, the four voices begin singing the same pitches at the same time, but in four different rhythmic meters. This causes the voices to slowly stagger. • After the voices are staggered, the voices sing in rounds (comparable to Row, Row, Row Your Boat) |
|
|
• mass cycle based on a preexisting melody • Melody used in all voices, not only tenor • Chant: source of melodic material for the mass |
|
|
Multiple notes per syllable |
|
|
• Luther regarded music as a crucial tool for launching the new faith • Promotes congregational participation • Can also be practiced at home with private devotions • strophic (melody is repeated over and over again), unison German hymn meant to replace chant • Melodies adapted from existing Gregorian chants or popular secular songs • Texts are in German (the vernacular) • 1520s |
|
|
• English equivalent of the choral motet • Performed in church of England services and used for home devotions • composition of sacred music w/ text in vernacular instead of Latin was a key contribution of the Reformation • Ex: Sing Joyfully, Byrd (pg. 241) |
|
|
• Composers start to become interested in how music can accent words, i.e. poetry • Attempt to use music to imitate the meaning of the text • Musical imagery – descending scale on the word “descend” (ex: Pope Marcellus Mass) • three voices to represent the trinity where there had been full voicing up until that point (ex: Three-voice texture for “Filium Dei unigenitum”) |
|
|
16th Century Madrigal • Audience was educated and well versed in music and literature • Performed in salons: gatherings of intellectuals to engage in dialogue and musical performance • Enjoyed by elite and lower class who can afford prints of the music, but mostly for the enjoyment of the performers themselves • Performed with one voice on a part at elite gatherings, co-ed (sometimes instruments would replace a voice) • Used partbooks 16th Century Italian Madrigal • Free rhyme scheme• Elevated poetry • written for professional singers (important to the courts in Northern Italy) |
|
|
? Created at court and among the aristocracy; Spanish alternative to French chanson ? Texts evoke the life of Spanish peasants ? Humorous text ? Suggests that peasants are happy with their lives, as long as they get to eat and drink ? Poetic form varies, but always includes a refrain and at least one stanza |
|
|
• Italian secular/popular song of the 16th century • Usually aristocratic music • Developed at the court of Mantua • Direct forerunner of 16th century madrigal • Ex: Io non compro by Cara (pg. 290) |
|
|
• Need for simpler type of music that Aristocrats can participate in and still be amateurs • If someone practiced too often, they were seen as desperate to make a living that way; lowly professional musicians • Syllabic, homorhythmic, strophic setting • Root-position triads • Simple enough for Aristocrats to take part in |
|
|
• Rise of Burgundy; • Location: today’s Belgium/Netherlands • Council where church officials meet and bring their people w/ them (including musicians) • Exposed to each other’s music • French add English elements into their music o Syllabic, consonant 3rds and 6ths, regular phrasing, homorhythmic textures |
|
Use of pre-existent musical material in Mass settings |
|
Paraphrase mass • Each movement based on same polyphonic work, all voices adapted in the mass • Ex: O Magnum Mysterium by Victoria (pg. 269) • Ex: Nun Komm der Heiden Heiland by Luther (pg. 231) • Ex: Missa Pange Lingua by Josquin (pg. 217) • Ex: Missa Se la face ay pale by Du Fay (pg. 179) |
|
Role of music in the Lutheran and Anglican Churches |
|
Lutheran- congregational participation o Musical Targets for Reform ? Church serving as an artistic patron ? Professionalization of music (polyphony) ? Inaccessibility of the music and words to laity because of Latin text
Anglican: English church formally separated from the Roman Catholic church in 1534 • Latin?English in the service • Promotes congregational involvement o Musical Reactions • Syllabic settings of vernacular texts • Edward VI declared that composers should “setting thereunto a playn and distance note, for every syllable one” (syllabic, rather than melismatic; more about the message than the aesthetics of the music; use of the vernacular) o William Byrd, Sing Joyfully • Text in English • Syllabic text setting • Free use of imitation • Little homophony |
|
|
• Catholics realize that they have competition (with Protestants) and need to step up their game • See Palestrina in Reading 18 • Also turn their Latin texts into English for congregational purposes |
|
Musical rhetoric/text-music relationships |
|
• See text painting (#7 above) • Palestrina latching onto a word and trying to convey it’s meaning through music • Musical imagery |
|
Role of music in royal courts |
|
• The Spanish Courts; Villancico • Ferdinand/Isabella • Encina’s Oy comamos y bebamos (pg. 287) • Formes fixes; really hard compared to Parisian chanson |
|
|
• print allows genres to emerge in middle/aristocratic class • Italian madrigals performed in salons-courtesans are not aristocratic |
|
Social context of the Italian madrigal |
|
• Motivation from 14th century medieval poet (sex in the courts) • Sing for pleasure, not necessarily for audience • Women sing too; courtesans who basically traded sexual favors etc. for a living; still members of the court, but of lower class. However, they had more fun and were known for their musicianship as well. |
|