Over the course of the one-year study, they were three times more likely to hit a teacher, over 2. 5 times more likely to get arrested, twice as likely to have multiple sexual partners and 1. 5 times more likely to get a sexually transmitted disease, use drugs, or drink alcohol. “Rap initially does leave a bad taste in people mouths, the quote provides statistical evidence that supports why people should and would despise it. Aaron, with his own warrant states, that genre of rap music is blanketed by its popular view of being a negative Influence.

Aaron says that “Rap music has long had a reputation of being a form of music that represents violence, sexual exploitation and excess. The genre has been criticized in the media, associated with some of the nation’s social ill and seen by a good number of people as bad on citizens in general. ” He first goes against his own viewpoints to prove that he understands the issue. He provides a counterargument to prove he is a reliable source about how rap can be seen as a social ill. Aaron’s use of the Toll argument continues as he offers is rebuttal and backing by saying, not all rap music Is bad music.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Aaron states, “There its audience. There are songs that denounce violence and call for more peace and togetherness in the inner city in an attempt to improve the quality of life. ” Some truth that the author stresses is how there is positive rap and it can serve as a purpose of improving social consciousness. An example rap group he uses to provide evidence to his backing is a group named “The East Coast Alistair. ” He supports this group because it adds qualification that not all rap music is bad music.

But most importantly because the group understands that music is highly influential, so they really push and write songs that gives positive influence to these communities that are being run by violence, sex, and drug exploitations. Cheerier also reveals that he understands both sides of the subject by stating a counterargument of his own. He says that, “Parents need to know what their children are being exposed to. Certainly, rap is not the only music that portrays negative stereotypes or can negatively impact behaviors, and not all rap music should be implicated.

But there have been nearly 1,000 studies that have looked at the effects. ” Cheerier shows a weak side by admitting that not all rap music should be implicated. He is rationale and does admit that all rap music is not the case. How he collects himself is by telling readers to be aware that the studies about the effects are true. He also uses emotional evidence by explaining that parents especially should be aware of what their children are watching and listening too. Aaron’s reaction to Cheerier response is that he recognizes that people are so influenced by rap music.

People especially children see these rappers and replicate their behaviors. Curtis Aaron spills one huge secret that most of the things rappers and artist say they do are bias. Aaron writes, “Many times, the rap artist is creating a fictionally account of certain events for the purpose of intriguing and entertaining people and sometimes uses characters to facilitate those accounts… This is no different from other forms of entertainment, in particular, the movie industry. When our favorite actor portrays a gun toting, drug using, highly sexual character in a vie, it is not seen as degenerate. He gives a broader and new perspective on how people should view these fictional characters. Rappers are much like fictional characters from movies. He explains that the things they do such as gun toting, drug using, and sexual innuendos are all for the purpose of intriguing and entertaining people. In the highly debated argument of rap music being a controversial issue, both Cheerier and Aaron are identifying themselves as a scholarly source about the subject of rap music. Both understand and access reliable information to be used as a notable source.

Through the Toolkit model argument, both Side Cheerier and Curtis Aaron provide great strengths and explore the topic of rap to educate readers about their views. Cheerier states, that initially rap music automatically leaves a bad tastes in peoples mouth and provides good warrants and evidence to back his view. However, Aaron proves that his argument is stronger as he educates that the readers that his warrant, the genre of rap music is blanketed by its popular view of being a negative influence. He gives evidence of both for and against the issue and expands over Skirmisher’s argument.