These language barriers exist everywhere. They are present in schools, grocery stores, and even the court systems in the country. The court administrator is responsible for what goes on in the court room and addressing any problems or issues that may arise. In order to do this, it is necessary to approach the problem with an open mind and willingness to help those with a language barrier. The first step is to determine and admit that there is a problem with language barriers in the current court systems. The population in America is growing in leaps and bounds and the increase is to just white individuals that speak English.
The fact that many Americans today do not speak English makes for a large problem and lack of communication in society. The court systems are no different. When there is a language barrier present in a court, this means that the individual before the judge will not understand or be understood. This makes it impossible for this person to receive a fair and speedy trial or experience before the court system. Not only are language barriers present, but the ability to bridge these gaps with an interpreter has also proven to be a problem as not all routs are equipped with translators at all times.
The court administrator is the one who needs to train and educate court staff and stakeholders on the problems of language barriers and the lack of people to interpret different languages for the court system. The next step would be to train and certify interpreters to be present in the courts at all times. Collaboration and information sharing is also a big part of solving this problem. Without collaborating and communicating about this problem, nothing will change. Another method that may be implemented is a form of remote interpreting technology.
This simply means that an interpreter may not be available on sight so the interpreting is done remotely by video from another location, usually a call centre. In order to do these things, it is a definite must that there is total compliance with all legal requirements involved. The last thing to do is to look for the funding to do these things. Coming up with the money is usually the biggest problem that faces the court administrator in the situation of dealing with language barriers and the lack of interpreters available. The efforts made by the court administrator have been successful in some says.
However, there are still many individuals out there that need interpreters and they are not readily available to them. As society becomes more diverse, so does the need for increased numbers of interpreters in the court system. Though there may be people out there willing to learn to be interpreters and do the job of such, funding is not always available as it is needed to help with these types of changes. In conclusion, court administrators have a very large task ahead of them. The task of making sure that every person that needs an interpreter receives en is vital to the fairness of the court system.
It is not easy to ensure that interpreters are readily available in every court in the country. Training and funding for such training is not always easy to come by in the court system as the system is already overloaded, under staffed and short on money. The administrators are working in the right direction, but still have quite a ways to go. Reference NCSC Call to Action – Nation Center for State Courts retrieved from www. NCSC. Org Victim Rights in Wisconsin This paper will discuss victim’s rights in the state of Wisconsin. The rights of a victim and/or a witness to a crime are the same in Wisconsin.
There is not just a short list of rights extended to victims in this state, the list is quite extensive. Not only is the list extensive, it is rather explicit about what it includes. The rights of victims and witnesses have a large impact on the proceedings of criminal law in the state. These impacts will also be covered in the fool lowing paragraphs. In Wisconsin, victims have many rights by law. As mentioned in the introduction, there is an extensive list Of rights extended to victims or dinettes off crime in the state of Wisconsin. Many of these rights are common sense and others are not, but they all make sense.
Here is the list of rights; -Right to privacy -To be told their rights and how to use them -To receive information regarding the offender’s release from custody, and sentencing -To be notified of any decision not to prosecute or if the charges are dismissed -To talk to the prosecutor representative about the case outcome -To be told when any proceedings will take place and to be present for them -To have a separate waiting area than with the defendant To receive a speedy disposition of the case -To be taken into consideration when a delay or continuance is asked for Assistance with their employer if necessary because of court proceedings -In some cases it is a right to be accompanied by a service representative and to have disease testing done and results released -To present a written or oral impact statement that tells the economic, physical, and psychological effects the crime has had -To have the impact on the victim included in the persistence investigation -To receive restitution or a Civil judgment for any situation not paid -To get compensation for certain expenses -The return of any property that is no longer needed as evidence -Any information regarding parole and being part of it -To be notified by the Department of Corrections of any escapes, releases, or confinements -To be notified of any appeals for a pardon and to be allowed to submit a written statement to the court -To contact the Department of Justice with any questions or concerns about the case -To receive information about counseling or other help to deal with the situation This is a long very detailed list that is definitely a good way to protect a victim or a witness to a crane. These rights have a very large impact on the criminal law proceedings in Wisconsin.
Not only do these rights make it possible for the victim to be involved, they demand it (if the victim wants to be involved). Criminal law proceedings that contain a victim that wants to be involved are a little trickier than a case without a directly involved victim. The proceedings must take place ensuring that every right extended to the victim is upheld to the fullest extent. The state of Wisconsin takes victim’s rights very seriously. Therefore, it is the job of the court to make sure that the victim of a crime is kept aware of everything that goes on in the case. It makes it necessary for there to be someone to take care of the paperwork and the notifications of the victim or victims in the case at hand.