How far was Mussolini’s control of Italy in the years 192543 dependent on the use of terror? In the years 1 925 to 1943 Mussolini had control over Italy and to an extent t his control was dependent on the use of terror. However, it can be argued that it wasn’t the o only factor and that it was his policies and governments appeal to the populace that got him genuine e support. But this support was maintained by his ability to crush opposition and prevent challenge GE.
The threat and use Of force against the Italian populace played a role in maim initiating Mussolini’s intro, preventing challenge and his ability to crush opposition. The death of Immediate in 1924 proved to the Italian people that Mussolini had no objection to the use of term or and violence, although Mussolini denies involvement there’s evidence to suggest he did. By 1926 open opposition became increasingly more difficult due to a ban on political activity outside the e Fascist Party and by this time it was probable that Fascist Squads murdered around 2000 opponent ants.
The terror went further, Mussolini used the secret police, the OVER, to spy on dissidents, which led to them being severely beaten up and imprisoned without trial. This would act as a warning to others not to oppose and without opposition Mussolini’s control remained. AntiFascist opposition no longer had a platform for their views after the IM position of press censorship. Due to this, within Italy, opposition was sparse and disorganized. But some groups like the Communists who tried to maintain an underground party organization PU blushed their own newspaper, Limit , which distributed antifascist leaflets.
However, it was constantly hounded by the regime and in 1 927 the founder of L ‘Unit;, Grammas was imprisoned. This inclines to others that opposition will not be tolerated by the regime and ensures Mussolini’s control . There were few individuals who openly criticized the regime and from time to time the OVER or the militia simply assaulted people which was thought to “encourage” cooperation, it was gauges sting that conformity was the safest option. Again, this shows the extent of Mussolini’s use of terror and how he used it to maintain his control.
Another use of terror was the setting up of concentration camps, which were on a lot smaller scale than that of Nazi concentration camps. They held fewer than 5000 prisoners, t he conditions were tough and some torture did occur but brutality was not systematic. Mussolini mainly used them for the punishment of those who oppose the regime. This suggests that Mussolini i did need terror to maintain his control as he had to keep opposition to a minimum to succeed. Despite the use of terror, it can be argued that Mussolini’s economic policies were what maintained his control.
Firstly, the regime claimed credit for increasing profits and tried to win over industrialists by appointing Alberta De Stefan as Treasury Minister which would help areas ere industrialists due to his traditional policy. However, by 1 925 Mussolini had dismissed De Stefan an d took less notice of business interests, meaning his support would be more dependent on his use of terror and he stopped caring about genuine support from the Italian people. At this time the e boom in which the fascist party rose in began to come to an end and the exchange rate of lira WA falling against other currencies.
Mussolini found this unacceptable and so declared his ‘battle for Ii RA’. The revaluation of the lira should of helped the Italian consumer which would win him over there e support, however Mussolini prevented this by placing high tariffs on many foreign imports which h made him unpopular and therefore made him more dependent on the use of terror as his genuine support declined.