In his interview with William F. Buckley Jar in 201 1, Capote states that the death penalty is “extreme, cruel, unusual punishment. ” He illustrates this claim in his writing when describing the details of Lowell Lee Andrews’ hanging. Dick grimly states, “Old Andy, he d enhanced for a long time… Seemed like [his heart] never would [stop]. The fact is, his heart eke apt beating for nineteen minutes. ” (336) This narration provides insight into the graphic dead h of Andrews, rather supporting the assertion that capital punishment is cruel. Capote reef tees the questionable claim that “[Those being hanged] don’t feel nothing.

Drop, snap, and that’s it” ( 340) by including the dire detail that Andrews was left alive and suffering for almost t went minutes. Capote also states in his interview with Buckley that there is no “real, genuine, systematic approach” to sentencing a criminal because “courts allow this endless policy o f appeal to such a degree that a person could spend arrears on [Death Row]”. Capote deems this unsystematic Kong 2 approach in convicting persons as time consuming, and believes that waiting years for an execution is cruel and unusual punishment.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Even Dick himself states “what is all this legal farce, why haven’t those associations Smith and Hickory got it in the neck, how co me those murdering associations are still eating up the taxpayers’ money? Well, I can see their side e. ” (336) Capote includes this quote to show that even Dick, who eventually receives the death penalty, understands that the process of sending a criminal off to death row is nuance scarily long and costly, and hence unmethodical and cruel.

Lastly, Capote displays his belief that Dick and Perry received an unfair trial by unveiling several details that point out questionable judgments throughout the case. He reveals that the two lawyers of the case were “motivated by a hardheaded opinion that the defend daunts had been the victims of a ‘nightmarishly unfair trial”‘ (336). He also includes the psychologist ‘s finding that Perry is schizophrenic, which ended up not being presented at trial. By mentis owing what the court did not allow, he is showing the reader that Dick and Perry were not .NET titled to a just redirect.